A Digest on the Trinity - Pat 10: Historical Definitions
This article is tenth in a series called A Digest on the Trinity.
In the previous article, we looked at some Trinitarian heresies and errors that arise when speaking of the Trinity in analogies. In this article, we will examine several historical creeds and confessions that defined the doctrine of the Trinity, laying the standard of Christian orthodoxy. These definitions are authoritative insofar as they are consistent with the Scriptures; no Christian denies that they are (broadly at least). The definitions this article will examine are the:
-
Nicene Creed
-
Athanasian Creed
-
Belgic Confession
-
Westminster Standards
-
1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith
Nicene Creed
The creed we call the Nicene Creed today should more accurately be called the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, since it involved the efforts of both the councils of Nicea I (325) and Constantinople I (381). It was drafted in the same structure as the earlier Apostles’ Creed, with more elaboration on the deity of the Son, since it was produced to refute Arianism. The keystone phrase in this creed would probably be the term homoousios, of the same ousia, translated into “being of one substance with the Father”, establishing unequivocally the full deity of the Son.
One can notice from the broad themes of the Nicene Creed that it was not meant to simply be a Trinitarian creed; it was supposed to provide the standard of Christian orthodoxy of its day, including issues on Christology, pneumatology, ecclesiology and eschatology.
Athanasian Creed
Though Athanasius is revered as a staunch and courageous defender of Trinitarian doctrine, it is unclear who actually wrote the Athanasian Creed – it is widely accepted that the author of the creed simply used Athanasius’ name for clout. As such, it ought not to be seen as authoritative as the Nicene Creed, for it was not produced by the Church catholic. Yet, it is produced in part here for its absolute stunning descriptions balancing the absolute singularity yet plurality of God.
The beauty of the Athanasian Creed lies in the way it moves rhythmically and seamlessly between the affirmation of there being only one God and the affirmation of there being three persons in this one God. All three share the same attributes not because of a common divine essence, but because of the same divine essence that enables us to say that the Father is X, the Son is X, the Spirit is X, but there is only one X.
Belgic Confession
The Belgic Confession was written in 1561 by Guido de Bres, to persuade Spain’s Philip II that the Protestant faith was biblical and ought not to be persecuted. He was to die for the faith later.[1] Together with the 1563 Heidelberg Catechism and the 1619 Canons of Dort, it would form the Three Forms of Unity, the confessional standards of the Reformed churches in continental Europe. Articles 8 to 11 deal with the Trinity, with Article 8 providing the general definition of the Trinity produced below:
Article 9 provides the Scriptural basis for the doctrine, while Articles 10 and 11 deal with the specific deity of the Son and Spirit respectively. A unique feature of the Belgic Confession is that it aligns itself with the church fathers’ tradition of calling the Son the Father’s Wisdom and the Spirit the Father’s Power, to indicate the eternality of each – the Father is never without His Wisdom nor His Power.
Westminster Standards
The Westminster Standards, drafted from 1646 to 1647 by the Westminster Assembly, has proved to be one of the most enduring Reformed confessions. It includes the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Westminster Larger Catechism and the Westminster Shorter Catechism. These Standards would become the confessional standard of Reformed churches on the British Isles, featuring most prominently in Scottish Presbyterianism. Today, it remains the confession of Presbyterian churches around the world.
The confession establishes first the one true and living God in Chapters 2.1 and 2.2, before mentioning the diversity in Chapter 2.3. The two catechisms take for granted the doctrine produced in the confession, as seen in their apparent “leap” in the order of questions.
Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter 2.3:
Westminster Larger Catechism
8. Are there more Gods than one?
9. How many persons are there in the Godhead?
10. What are the personal properties of the three persons in the Godhead?
The Westminster Standards stand firmly within the orthodox tradition of affirming the eternal processions as the only way to distinguish between the otherwise indistinguishable divine persons.
1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith
Originally written in 1677 by Calvinistic and covenantal Baptists to show their similarities with the Reformed, the Second London Baptist Confession was only adopted officially in 1689. It is an essential modification of the Westminster Confession of Faith, edited to allow for a Baptistic understanding of the covenants and baptism. Its chapter and paragraph ordering are virtually identical to the Westminster Confession. The 1689 Confession’s Chapter 2.3 includes attractive additions to Westminster’s Chapter 2.3, which provides an altogether richer definition of the Trinity.
The attractive additions would be the assertion that each person is the whole divine essence, which us undivided – this affirms against partialism, as well as the assertion that the doctrine of the Trinity is no high theology – rather, it is the very foundation of the Christian faith and piety.
Given that I myself hold to the 1689 Confession, I would believe this definition to be superior to the Belgic and Westminster confessions. My only gripe, however, would be the unreasonable number of commas and lack of periods.
Value of creedal and confessional definitions
Christianity is doctrinal in nature. Paul’s instruction to Timothy was to “hold fast to the form of sound words” (2 Tim 1:13, emphasis added). The ancient creeds and Reformed confessions provide a form of sound words with which we can begin describing the Trinity accurately and biblically. With these definitions, it is easier to identify heresy and establish fellowship in orthodoxy. We neglect creeds and confessions at our own peril.
Other than written definitions, the teaching of the doctrine has also been helped along by diagrammatic representations, to which the next article will turn.
[1] Chad Van Dixhoorn, “Introduction to the Belgic Confession” in ESV Bible with Creeds and Confessions (Crossway, 2016) at p 1264.